|
Credibility: ★★☆☆☆ 2/5
|
Threat Level: LOW (LOW — it appears to be improving property values.)
Nine witnesses, six modifications, and one Parish Zoning Board that is having a very unusual Tuesday.
As of last Thursday morning, Delphine Arceneaux’s back porch had no additional walls. By Friday evening, it had one — load-bearing, cypress, approximately eleven feet tall, and threaded through with living root structures that a structural engineer she called on Saturday described, over the phone, as ‘not how walls work.’ The wall was not there on Monday. It is there now. It is, by all available accounts, doing an excellent job.
Arceneaux is one of nine residents along the Atchafalaya Basin who have documented what they’re collectively calling organic modifications to their properties — alterations in material, structure, or layout that appeared overnight, without contractor involvement, and that several of them admit look better than what was there before. They are presenting their compiled photographic evidence to the St. Mary Parish Zoning Board this week under Complaint Category: Organic Modification Without Permit, a category the Zoning Board’s own clerk confirmed to me existed ‘technically, yes, we have had to use it before, please don’t ask follow-up questions about that.’ I have follow-up questions about that. I will be filing them separately.
It sealed the gap under my foundation slab. I’ve had a gap under that slab for nine years. Nine years. My husband couldn’t fix it. Three contractors couldn’t fix it. Whatever did this fixed it in one night and I don’t know how to feel about that.
— Delphine Arceneaux, Resident, St. Mary Parish
For context: the Louisiana Swamp Thing is a cataloged entry in the WTC regional cryptid index — semi-aquatic, presumed vegetative in composition, with a documented history of sightings concentrated in the Atchafalaya Basin going back to the 1970s. Previous reported interactions have been passive. This is the first cluster of documented property modifications on record, which is either a behavioral escalation or evidence of something that has been quietly doing home improvement in the Louisiana bayou for fifty years without anyone filing the right paperwork. Both possibilities are being taken seriously. One of them is being taken more seriously by me personally.
The Six Modifications, Ranked By How Much Explaining The Homeowner Had To Do
A Load-Bearing Wall (Arceneaux Property)
Already mentioned, but cannot be overstated: a wall appeared. Cypress and root, structurally sound, positioned precisely where the porch’s original design had an open span that according to Arceneaux ‘always felt wrong.’ The structural engineer who visited in person on Sunday said the root integration was ‘almost like the wood was guided into place.’ He has not returned calls since Monday. The wall remains. It is holding up the roof.
A Reinforced Dock Piling (Thibodaux Property, River Road)
Beau Thibodaux’s primary dock piling — the one he’d been meaning to replace since 2021 — was found wrapped in a dense lattice of fibrous root material that had effectively re-anchored it to the bank. ‘It’s stronger now than when we put it in,’ Thibodaux told me. ‘It should not be stronger. It is forty-year-old wood.’ The wrapping is biologially active. It is still growing, slowly, in a direction Thibodaux describes as ‘helpful.’ He has not removed it. He does not plan to.
A Redirected Drainage Channel (Mouton Property)
The drainage channel on Cecile Mouton’s property has been redirected approximately eight feet east, away from her house foundation and toward a natural runoff point she says ‘every contractor told me was the right place for it but nobody wanted to do the digging.’ The earth was disturbed. The channel is now correct. No equipment was involved that Mouton or her neighbors observed. She is including before-and-after photographs in her Zoning Board submission under the notation ‘unauthorized earthwork’ and has also noted, in the margin, ‘but genuinely thank you.’
A Patched Roof Section (Fontenot Property)
The northwest corner of Raymond Fontenot’s storage shed roof, which had been missing two shingles since Hurricane Ida, is now covered by a dense, flat-pressed layer of compressed moss and fibrous plant material that Fontenot describes as ‘waterproof, I checked.’ He checked with a garden hose. He checked three times. He has submitted a sample to LSU AgCenter. The AgCenter has not yet responded. He is not waiting for them to respond before using the shed.
A Blocked Window (Bergeron Property, Disputed)
This one is complicated. The window on the east side of Marguerite Bergeron’s spare bedroom is now partially covered by a root formation that has grown in from the exterior sill. Bergeron is the only complainant who used the word ‘violation’ without any subsequent softening. ‘I didn’t ask for any of this,’ she told me. ‘I don’t want vines on my window.’ Her neighbor, who asked not to be named, quietly told me that the window in question looks directly into Bergeron’s spare bedroom and that the formation, whatever its origin, has improved the privacy situation considerably. I am reporting both perspectives. I have my own.
A Filled Foundation Crack (Arceneaux Property, Secondary Finding)
In the course of photographing the wall for their Zoning Board submission, the Arceneaux family discovered a second modification they had not initially noticed: a hairline foundation crack running approximately four feet along the east slab — documented in a 2019 inspection report, never repaired — has been filled with a dense, hardened root compound that the same structural engineer described, in his written notes, as ‘exhibiting load-transfer properties consistent with professional epoxy injection’ before writing ‘I’m going home’ and ending his site visit. The crack is sealed. The foundation is stable. The engineer did not charge for the visit.
FIELD ALERT
If you live along the Atchafalaya Basin and notice structural changes to your property that you did not authorize, document them with timestamped photographs before contacting anyone. If the changes appear to be improvements, document those too — the Zoning Board complaint process requires evidence of the modification regardless of your feelings about it. Do not attempt to remove root material without consulting someone. I am not saying do not consult a contractor. I am saying also consult someone else.
I’ve been on this board eleven years. I have seen the Organic Modification Without Permit category used twice. Once was a kudzu situation and once I cannot discuss. This is the third time. We do not have a precedent for when the modification is load-bearing.
— Parish Zoning Board Clerk (name withheld at source’s request)
FAST FACTS
• Witnesses: 9 across 6 properties
• Modifications confirmed structurally sound: 5 of 6 (Bergeron window classification pending)
• Permits filed for any modification: 0
• Contractors who visited and have since returned calls: 1 of 3
• Zoning Board hearing date: This Thursday, 10 a.m., St. Mary Parish Government Complex
• Estimated repair cost if homeowners had hired contractors for equivalent work: $34,000 (per Thibodaux’s informal estimate; he’s a contractor)
The Parish Zoning Board hearing is Thursday. The residents are going. Most of them are going with the photographic evidence and, in Arceneaux’s case, a hand-drawn diagram of where the wall is relative to where the wall was not. The complaint category requires them to request either removal or retroactive permitting of the modifications. Several of the nine witnesses told me, independently and with varying degrees of embarrassment, that they are planning to request retroactive permitting. Bergeron is requesting removal. I respect that. I think she is wrong about the window.
I drove back to Portland with seventeen pages of notes in the yellow notebook — the yellow one is field reporting, the blue one is follow-up calls, the green one was supposed to be administrative but I’ve been using it for everything since April — and I’ve added this case to REAL ACTUAL EVIDENCE under a subfolder I’ve labeled HELPFUL. It’s the only subfolder in that folder. I’m not sure what to do with that. Mr. Whiskers sat on the yellow notebook when I got home, which I am choosing to interpret as editorial enthusiasm. He’s a good listener. He has no opinions about permits.
pennyhart@whatthecryptid.com
Penny Hart · Features Writer & Community Content Specialist — WTC
Seven feet tall. Smells like the bottom of something.
